{"id":698,"date":"2021-01-14T16:17:11","date_gmt":"2021-01-14T16:17:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sociologiecraiova.ro\/revista\/?p=698"},"modified":"2026-02-12T23:16:34","modified_gmt":"2026-02-12T23:16:34","slug":"publication-ethics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sociologiecraiova.ro\/revista\/2021\/01\/publication-ethics\/","title":{"rendered":"PUBLICATION ETHICS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Revista Universitar\u0103 de Sociologie<\/em> (RUS) is a peer-reviewed academic journal committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and academic integrity. All parties involved in the publication process \u2014 editors, reviewers, authors, and the publisher \u2014 are required to adhere to ethical principles that ensure transparency, fairness, and scientific responsibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This document outlines the ethical standards governing editorial decision-making, peer review, authorship responsibilities, and the management of research integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Non-Plagiarism Declaration<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

RUS maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy regarding plagiarism, duplicate publication, falsification of data, and any form of academic misconduct. Submitted manuscripts must represent original work that has not been previously published and is not under consideration elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A. Editorial Responsibilities<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fairness and Editorial Independence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Editors evaluate manuscripts exclusively on academic merit, including originality, methodological rigor, clarity, and relevance to the journal\u2019s scope. Editorial decisions are made independently and without discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, nationality, institutional affiliation, political views, or personal beliefs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Editor-in-Chief has full responsibility for editorial content and publication decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Confidentiality<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Editors and editorial staff treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. Information about submissions is disclosed only to individuals directly involved in the editorial process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conflicts of Interest<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Editors must avoid handling manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist. If a conflict arises, editorial responsibility will be reassigned to another qualified editor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unpublished materials contained in submitted manuscripts must not be used for personal research without the explicit written consent of the authors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Publication Decisions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

All manuscripts undergo peer review by at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Final publication decisions consider reviewer evaluations, scientific merit, originality, and legal considerations such as copyright compliance and avoidance of plagiarism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Handling Ethical Concerns<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The editorial team investigates all allegations of misconduct. When ethical concerns are confirmed, appropriate actions may include correction, expression of concern, or retraction of the article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B. Reviewer Responsibilities<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Contribution to Editorial Decisions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peer review supports editorial decisions and contributes to improving manuscript quality. Reviewers must provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Promptness<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reviewers who are unable to complete a review within the required timeframe or who lack appropriate expertise should promptly decline the invitation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Confidentiality<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Manuscripts received for review are confidential and must not be shared or discussed with third parties without editorial authorization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Objectivity and Professional Conduct<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reviews should be conducted objectively, avoiding personal criticism. Comments should be clearly justified and constructive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Acknowledgement of Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reviewers should identify relevant work not cited by the authors and notify editors of any substantial similarity with other publications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conflicts of Interest<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest and decline review assignments where impartiality cannot be maintained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

C. Author Responsibilities<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reporting Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Authors must present accurate, honest, and transparent accounts of research. Manuscripts should contain sufficient detail to allow replication where applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Originality and Plagiarism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Authors must ensure originality and proper citation of all sources. Plagiarism, including unattributed copying or misrepresentation of others\u2019 work, is unacceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Multiple or Concurrent Submission<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Manuscripts must not be submitted simultaneously to more than one journal or published elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Authorship Criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Authorship should be limited to individuals who:<\/p>\n\n\n\n